Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Dykes

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided February 12, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00255Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION MICHAEL W. PRUITT PETITIONER v. No. 3:23CV255-MPM-JMV WARDEN DYKES RESPONDENT MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the court on the pro se petition of Michael W. Pruitt for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State has moved to dismiss the petition, in part, as untimely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) — and, in part, for failure to state a valid claim under 28 US.C. § 2254. Pruitt has responded, and the State has replied. The matter is ripe for resolution. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Davis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API