Hofmeister v. Hunter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The trial court held that this controversy was ruled by Graef v. Kanouse, 205 Wis. 597, 238 N. W. 377, although it clearly recognized that the facts there considered were not at all like the facts here. In that case, after reviewing the decisions of this court in Will of Dardis, 135 Wis. 457, 115 N. W. 332; Will of Rice, 150 Wis. 401, 136 N. W. 956, 137 N. W. 778; Will of Reynolds, 151 Wis. 375, 138 N. W. 1019; Schoenwetter v. Schoenwetter, 164 Wis. 131, 159 N. W. 737; Estate of Staab, 166 Wis. 587, 166 N. W. 326, and the public policy of this state with respect to wills, this court was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Will on DardisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Boynton v. HubbardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Estate of StaabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Schoenwetter v. SchoenwetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greene v. Bride & Son Construction CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Scott v. First Nat. Bank, Adm.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Cortte v. TolzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Milwaukee Catholic Home for the Aged v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Thayer v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.