Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 21, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff was a passenger on a plane owned and operated by the defendants which crashed on Rikers Island shortly after its take-off. The defendants’ answer, among other matters, denies they were negligent. The plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order striking the answer of the defendants and granting summary judgment on the ground that there is no issue of fact as to liability, leaving open only the question of damages which she asks be assessed by a jury. The basis of the motion, which rests essentially upon the *533ple…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Kous-TV, Inc. v. Spot Time, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Northrip v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API