Manarrow Realties, Inc. v. E. J. Conrad Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
While the order appealed from is in the interest of substantial justice, it must be reversed because it contravenes the provisions of the Civil Practice Act and the rules. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 433; Rules Civ. Prac. rule 150.) In the event that the plaintiff does not act with reasonable dispatch, the respondents will be entitled to relief under section 123 of the Civil Practice Act. We are unable to glean from the complaint any reason why the defendants Bond and Arms were made parties defendant. The complaint is verified by the defendant Bond and the respondents may well hereafter be entitled to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Weisinger v. RaeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Brandstetter v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Roman v. CaputoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951