Legal Opinion

Roman v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no compelling reason here presented why there should be a departure from the well-recognized requirement that a note of issue must be filed at least twelve days before the commencement of any term and that a preference should not be granted until an action is properly on the calendar (Rules Civ. Prac., rules 150, 151; Manarrow Realties, Inc., v. Conrad Corp., 222 App. Div. 652; cf. Zimmerman v. Rahmeyer, 230 App. Div. 719). The proper practice for plaintiff to have adopted in the circumstances was to have moved for an injunction pendente lite. In disposing of that injunction, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. RahmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Manarrow Realties, Inc. v. E. J. Conrad Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Roberts v. SchafAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vinal v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Moran v. Portchester Iron Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API