Legal Opinion

People v. Rubino

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1999No. 2—98—0773, 2—98—0775 consPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp

The State appeals from the McHenry County circuit court’s orders excluding from two cases the testimony of two expert witnesses and the laboratory report the experts prepared (collectively, the evidence). In these consolidated appeals, the State argues that the trial judge abused his discretion when he denied the State’s motion to supplement discovery with the newly found evidence. The trial court excluded the evidence as a sanction under Supreme Court Rule 415(g)(i) (134 Ill. 2d R. 415(g)(i)) for the State’s inadvertent failure to comply with a discovery order. Although we do not condone the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. EliasonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. People v. HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. HeinzmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. People v. LeonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. People v. BagleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. PettyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. People v. StrobelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API