Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Ball

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1923No. 3754Published

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

This writ is to review a judgment, upon verdict of jury, in favor of defendant in error (plaintiff below) against plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant), for negligent injuries alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff while a passenger upon defendant’s train, through the entry of an excessive and unusual volume of black and poisonous smoke and gases into the coach in which plaintiff was riding, while the train was passing through a long tunnel on a warm day in June. Defendant’s negligence was charged to consist in the failure of the firemah.'to use care to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Edmunson v. Pullman Palace-Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API