Legal Opinion
State v. Hedge
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 14, 2006No. AC 25372PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Kareem Hedge, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a), possession of narcotics with the intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-278 (b), possession of narcotics with the intent to sell within 1500 feet of a public housing project in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b) and interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a (a). The trial court also determined that the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Simmons v. Kmart Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. AnconaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HolbrookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. Lee-RiverasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.