Legal Opinion

Heddan v. Walden Farmers Elevator Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From a judgment of the District Court, Cass County, Pollock, J.,, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.

This case was argued and submitted together with the case of Wonser v. Elevator Co. ante, 382, 153 N. W. 1012. This is an action for damages for conversion of the same flax involved in the other case. The plaintiff, Heddan, also claims under a farm laborer’s lien. It was conceded on the argument that the evidence in the two cases is substantially the same, and that upon all the questions decided in the case of Wonser v. Elevator Co.,- a determination of one case would be decisive of the other. The pleadings are similar, and the record respecting the objection to the introduction of testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Breault v. ArchambaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Lowe v. AbrahamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Saloy v. DragonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  4. Wonser v. Walden Farmers Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Courtenay Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Stevenson v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Stevenson v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API