Legal Opinion
Larson v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 13, 1994No. 06-94-00042-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
Louanne Larson appeals from her conviction for capital murder. Larson contends that the trial court erred by admitting her oral statement and evidence seized under her consent to search because they were tainted by her illegal arrest and that the court erred in overruling her motion to transfer venue.
This case is based upon the same facts as those set out in our opinion disposing of the appeal of Tim Rule.
ADMISSION OF ITEMS SEIZED PURSUANT TO CONSENT
Larson first contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence obtained through a search of Larson’s apartment,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Louanne Larson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
- Louanne Larson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Rule v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994