Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Terre Haute Water-Works Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1884No. 8785PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The questions presented by the first and third paragraphs of the appellant’s complaint are the same, and may be thus stated:

First. Has a municipal corporation the incidental authority to sell stock subscribed by it in the capital stock of a water-works company incorporated under the laws of this State ?

Second. Is there any provision in the law under which the city of Terre Haute is incorporated, or in the law under which the water-works company is organized, prohibiting the sale of such stock? Of these in their order, -

We have no hesitation in holding that a municipal corporation may sell…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Boyle v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Shannon v. O'BoyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. City of Terre Haute v. LakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. City of Logansport v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hoffman v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. East Chicago Co. v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API