Legal Opinion

Eskra v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2363 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Annabelle Eskra (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Re*438view (Board) affirming a referee’s decision which concluded: 1) that Claimant was not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits under Section 404(d) (iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law)1 and; 2) that Claimant was liable for a nonfault overpayment under Section 804(b) of the Law.2 We affirm.

The facts as found by the referee and adopted by the Board are not in dispute. Claimant was employed in a knitting mill until October 7, 1982, when she was laid off…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Sanders v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Mahland v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Virginia Employment Commission v. NuneryCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Sanders v. Mississippi Employment Security CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Vaught v. Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API