Legal Opinion

Didier v. Drexel Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 24, 1997No. 15593-5-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, C.J.

We are asked in this case to revisit the preemptive reach of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) in Washington in light of a recent United States Supreme Court opinion, Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 116 S. Ct. 2240, 135 L. Ed. 2d 700 (1996). We conclude that Medtronic does not change the holding reached by our Supreme Court that FIFRA preempts state common-law causes of action based on labeling. All-Pure Chem. Co. v. White, 127 Wn.2d 1, 896 P.2d 697 (1995); Goodwin v. Bacon, 127 Wn.2d 50, 896 P.2d 673 (1995); Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., 127 Wn.2d 67, 896 P.2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Papas v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Romah v. Hygienic Sanitation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ackerman v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API