Legal Opinion

Orkin v. Albert

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 8, 2024No. 4:21-cv-40060Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X WAYNE ORKIN and ARTHUR ORKIN : : Plaintiffs, : v. : CIVIL NO. 4:21-cv-40060-MRG : LISA SUE ALBERT and IAN ALBERT : : Defendants : and : : PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER BOOST WEB SEO, INC. : : Intervenor-Plaintiff : v. : : WAYNE ORKIN : Intervenor-Defendant. : X Intervenor-Plaintiff Boost Web SEO, Inc. (“Boost Web”) has moved this Court for a permanent injunction to prevent Intervenor-Defendant Wayne Orkin and anyone acting in concert with him from filing any action seeking to obtain control of Boost Web or interfere with Boost Web’s use of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API