Legal Opinion

Rieman v. Swope

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 2003No. 00-CV-0094-ST; A116891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff Collette Whitton, 1 and makes three assignments of error: The trial court erred when it (1) held that defendant violated ORS 90.610; (2) awarded Whitton $100 in noneconomic damages; and (3) refused to designate defendant as the prevailing party with regard to all plaintiffs except Whitton. Plaintiffs’ arguments present only questions of law and, accordingly, we review for errors of law, Wade v. Mahler, 167 Or App 350, 352, P3d 485, rev den, 331 Or 334 (2000), and reverse.

The facts are largely undisputed. Defendant was the landlord of Aspen Creek…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Wade v. MahlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaste v. Land O'Lakes Purina Feed, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Neikes v. Ticor Title Co. of Or.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API