Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1940Published

1Opinion of the CourtClarksoN, J.

The first question presented by defendant: “Was the court in error in not defining ‘greater weight’ or ‘preponderance of the evidence’?” We think not.

The burden of proof is a substantial right. Fisher v. Jackson, 216 N. C., 302 (304).

In Wilson v. Casualty Co., 210 N. C., 585 (590), it is written: “The defendant contended that in the first two above excerpts from the charge it was the duty of the court below in the charge to 'the jury to have defined what constituted the greater weight of the evidence, and in failing to do so the court committed error. C. S., 564. We cannot so hold. The burden…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . GoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API