Pieczynski v. Brunswick, Balke, Collender Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant employer and its insurer from an award in a hernia case. The principal question presented may be ,stated as follows: Is there any competent evidence to support the finding of the workmen’s compensation commission that plaintiff’s present hernia, which developed while working for a new and different employer, is of the recurrent type, and, therefore, related to the original hernia which she suffered while-in the employ of defendant company? Another necessary question is whether the former employer who provided a herniotomy is required to pay compensation when…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barclay v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Hargrove v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- McHan v. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ash v. Great Lakes Greyhound LinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1953