Legal Opinion
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 29, 2008No. 2:06-cv-276PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
R. ALLAN EDGAR, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (“Sault Tribe” or the “Tribe”) seeks a judgment from this court that it is entitled to conduct “Class III Gaming” on a parcel of its trust land pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory-Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. § § 2701-21. [Court Doc. No. 61]. Defendants United States of America, the National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”) and its Chairman, and the Department of the Interior (the “Department”) and its Secretary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Ryan ZinkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020