Smith v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
A person commits aggravated battery by knowingly or intentionally inflicting in jury on a person that causes protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ. 1 The case before us requires us to address as an issue of first impression whether a tooth is a “bodily member or organ” within the definition of this statute. Relying on caselaw from other jurisdictions interpreting similar aggravated battery statutes, we conclude that a tooth is a “bodily member or organ” within the definition of Indiana’s aggravated battery statute.
Appellant-defendan…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Ludy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Mendoza v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Vasquez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Clark v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Moala v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jeffrey Z. Hayden v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Charles S. Whitham v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bryson Tyrone Street v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.