Legal Opinion

Walker v. Acacia Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1937No. 32687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant was the sole beneficiary in a policy of life insurance issued by appellee. The policy lapsed for nonpayment of premiums, but was reinstated under provisions contained in the policy, among which was that the application for reinstatement must show the applicant to be in good health at the time of such application. It is undenied that the application for reinstatement was untrue in material particulars and that the falsity thereof was well known to the insured when made and forwarded to the company.

A copy of the application for reinstatement was not sent by the company to the insured,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. BuchbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Linder v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. National Life & Accident Insurance v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Holden v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Rothschild v. N. Y. Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sellwood v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Occidental Life Insurance Company of California v. FriedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
  3. Standard Life Ins. Co. v. BaldwinMississippi Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API