Legal Opinion
Caudle v. Nielsen Holdings PLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 2020No. 2:17-cv-13737Unknown
1Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DAVID CAUDLE, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-13737 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC, Defendant. ___________________________________/ OPINION & ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 36) Defendant The Nielsen Company (“Nielsen”) has filed a motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff David Caudle’s nine-count complaint. Nielsen Am. Mot. for Summ. J. (Dkt. 36). In the complaint, Caudle alleged that he experienced harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and intentional infliction of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.