Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Market Assn. v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1934No. 26,298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Appellants, by their complaint, seek to enjoin the enforcement of a certain ordinance of the city of Indianapolis, which amends a former ordinance establishing a city market, and providing for its management, control, and operation. A temporary restraining order was issued, and upon hearing a temporary injunction was refused, and this action of the lower court is the only error assigned in this appeal.

In order to invoke the jurisdiction of equity to determine the validity of an ordinance, there must first be asserted some property or civil right which the enforcement of the ordinance will…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitsch v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ratner, Tr. v. City of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Dagley v. Incorporated Town of Fairview ParkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Goldblatt Bros. Corp. v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Mitsch v. City of HammondIndiana Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API