Legal Opinion
Ratner, Tr. v. City of Richmond
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1965No. 20,100PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.
Appellants, by their amended complaint, seek to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance No. 1972 — 1962 of the City of Richmond, which amends the Master Plan Zoning Ordinance of that city, and rezones described real estate and property owned by the appellees Andrew F. Scott, Martha H. Scott, and Ruth E. Scott, from “A” and Suburban Residential to General Business in order to provide for the construction of a new shopping center.
Appellees demurred to the amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. One reason advanced in support of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Massachusetts State Grange v. BentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Indianapolis Market Assn. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Males, Mayor v. ElbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carpenter v. Whitley County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Folk v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Dagley v. Incorporated Town of Fairview ParkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- City of Gary v. AYERSIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Carpenter v. Whitley County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.