Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bergemann v. North Central Foundry, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 2, 1974No. 47,536Published

1DissentFromme, J.

The appellate role of this court requires us to accept the lower court’s findings if there is any evidence in the record to support the same. As I read the brief of appellant he does not contend there is no evidence to support the findings. They should be held conclusive. The only question remaining for this court to determine on review is whether the trial court properly applied the law to its findings of fact. I believe it did.

There is neither a factual basis nor legal precedent to support claimant’s contention that the district court should be ordered to enter an award for temporary total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Stevens Well ServiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Berger v. Hahner, Foreman & Cale, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Riggan v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Bushey v. Plastic Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API