Legal Opinion
Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided February 6, 1990No. 1-89-cv-2235-CAMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOYE, District Judge.
The above-styled action is before the court on the United State government’s motion to quash subpoena or, in the alternative, for a protective order, and plaintiffs’ motion for oral arguments on the government’s motion. For the reasons stated below, the government’s motion is GRANTED and the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are hemophiliacs infected with the HIV virus and have sought, by subpoena, testimony from two physicians who work for the Center for Disease Control (hereafter “CDC”), Dr. Francis and Dr. Evatt. Dr. Evatt’s subpoena is the subject of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Boron Oil Co. v. DownieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Application for Issuance of Order Requiring the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Produce Dr. Thomas Spittler to Testify by Videotape Deposition. Appeal of Sun Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Swett v. SchenkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Errol Ricardo BizzardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Louisiana v. Thomas Sparks, Jr., A/K/A Abdullah Hakim El Mumit v. Gordon Gsell, U.S. Probation OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Bobreski v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Bosaw v. National Treasury Employees' UnionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.