Bowser v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:
Appellant Terrence Bowser successfully appealed his first conviction and received a new trial and sentencing hearing before a new district court judge. After the second trial, the judge imposed a longer sentence on some of the counts than had the original trial judge, which Bowser claims is a due process violation. In Holbrook v. State , 90 Nev. 95, 98, 518 P.2d 1242, 1244 (1974), we recognized that a presumption of vindictiveness arises where a judge imposes a more severe sentence after a new trial. The sole issue before us is whether this presumption of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elmajzoub (Said) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. RojasColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
- STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
- Terrence Bowser v. Jerry Howell, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026