Legal Opinion

Bowser v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2019No. 71516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, HARDESTY, J.:

Appellant Terrence Bowser successfully appealed his first conviction and received a new trial and sentencing hearing before a new district court judge. After the second trial, the judge imposed a longer sentence on some of the counts than had the original trial judge, which Bowser claims is a due process violation. In Holbrook v. State , 90 Nev. 95, 98, 518 P.2d 1242, 1244 (1974), we recognized that a presumption of vindictiveness arises where a judge imposes a more severe sentence after a new trial. The sole issue before us is whether this presumption of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elmajzoub (Said) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. RojasColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Terrence Bowser v. Jerry Howell, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API