Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blevins

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 29, 1998No. 971419-CAPublished

1DissentOrme, Judge

I dissent. Although “ ‘the standard of probable cause must be particularized to every person or place to be searched,’ ” State v. Covington, 904 P.2d 209, 211 (Utah Ct.App.1995) (quoting State v. Ayala, 762 P.2d 1107, 1111 (Utah Ct.App.1988)), the affidavit supporting the search warrant in this case failed to establish the requisite nexus between the criminal activity in question and all persons — and their vehicles — arriving at the premises.

“[T]he forefathers, after consulting the lessons of history, designed our Constitution to place obstacles in the way of a too permeating police…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. De SimoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. CrialesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Marks v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API