Legal Opinion
Venaglia v. Kropinak
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 3, 1998No. 17660PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Chief Judge.(1) The Appellants, Frank Venaglia, Ann P. Venaglia, and Roy J. Venaglia (the Venaglias), sued Roy M. Kropinak on his guarantee of a $68,000 promissory note from Downtown Business Center, Inc. (DBC) to the Venaglias. On cross-motions for summary judgment the district court granted Kropinak’s motion and denied the Venaglias’. The Venaglias appeal, asking that we set aside the summary judgment against them and order the district court to enter summary judgment in their favor. This appeal requires us to examine suretyship defenses under the Uniform Commercial Code (the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bishop v. BeecherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Huckins v. RitterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., in Its Corporate Capacity, and as Receiver of Security National Bank v. Fred T. NoblesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc. v. YackIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALAMOGORDO v. CapeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilde v. WESTLAND DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Cameron Kdell Bagley v. Angela S. BagleyWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Randles v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- WXI/Z Southwest Malls Real Estate Liability Co. v. MuellerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.