Legal Opinion

Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc. v. Yack

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1994No. 19976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from a district court judgment in favor of Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., holding Linda and Martin Yack liable as guarantors for debts incurred by two corporations. The Yacks appeal, asserting error in the following rulings of the district court: (1) denial of the Yacks’ motion to change venue; (2) denial of their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction; (3) denial of their motion to dismiss on grounds that they had been discharged as guarantors of a portion of the debts claimed by Ponderosa; (4) granting of summary judgment against the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hearst Corp. v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bowles v. J. J. Schmitt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maynard v. NguyenIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cumberland Bank v. G & S IMPLEMENT CO.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Matter of Estate of KeevenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Mc Lean v. Cheyovich Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Venaglia v. KropinakNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API