Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The findings of fact on which the judgment was rendered in this action were supported by the evidence at the trial.

An examination of the complaint in this action and of the complaint in the action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant in the municipal court of High Point, discloses that the causes of action alleged in said complaints are substantially the same. The evidence at the trial of said actions is likewise substantially the same. There was no error in the findings of fact.

The judgment dismissing the action is supported by the findings of fact and is affirmed on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Brown v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Batson v. . Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles S. Hunt v. Howard H. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API