Legal Opinion

People v. Lipinski

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1976No. Crim. 15187PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRAY, J. *

Defendant and appellant John Lipinski appeals from judgment, after jury trial, of the San Francisco Superior Court, convicting him of violation of section 182 of the Penal Code and section 11912 of the Health and Safety Code (conspiracy to sell LSD, a restricted dangerous drug).

Issues Presented

1) The refiling of the conspiracy charge after its dismissal at the preliminary examination was not error.

2) The ruling on the admissibility of Miss Radford’s statements is not a factual finding that Van Raam’s testimony was inherently incredible.

Statement of Facts

The pertinent facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. StecconeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. AlcalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. OrdonezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Parnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. The People v. TranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API