Legal Opinion

Carlos Ayestas v. William Stephens, Director

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2019No. 15-70015PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge:

*387 Carlos Manuel Ayestas is a prisoner on death row in Texas. We previously affirmed the district court's denial of his request under 18 U.S.C. § 3599 (f) for investigatory funding because he had not shown a "substantial need" that made the funds "reasonably necessary" to the representation. The Supreme Court held the statute does not require a showing of "substantial need" and remanded with instructions to consider only whether funding is "reasonably necessary."

We conclude that investigatory funding is not reasonably necessary because nothing would establish…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  2. Aranda v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  3. Ayestas v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026
  4. Brewer v. Director, TDCJ-CIDDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  5. Chuong Tong v. Bobby Lumpkin, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API