Legal Opinion

The Rajah

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 15, 1852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a libel [against the bark Rajah, Wilcox, claimant] by a seaman for his share or lay in a whaling voyage.

1Opinion of the Court

SPRAGUE, District Judge.

I have . not thought it necessary to look at this case as an ordinary transaction, between merchant and merchant, which is the aspect in which the learned counsel for the respondent has presented it. It is a claim by a seaman, for compensation for marine service, in the nature of wages, and the admiralty deals with contracts respecting such service or compensation, differently from the manner in which a court of common law can treat ordinary transactions.

Seamen have been called the wards of the admiralty, and it habitually exercises a degree of guardianship over them,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  2. Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
  3. Domenico v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1901
  4. McCarty v. Steam-Propeller City of New BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
  5. Broux v. The IvyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API