Legal Opinion

Standard Cooperage Co. v. Dearman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 21, 1920No. 2 Div. 716PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was under subdivision 1 of Code, § 3910, and was submitted to the jury on counts 1 and 5. Count 2 was eliminated by demurrer, and counts 3 and 4 were stricken on plaintiff's motion. Issue was joined on pleas of the general issue and contributory negligence.

Of the eliminated counts nothing is presented for review. There was no error in overruling demurrer to counts 1 and 5, charging a defect in the ways, works, machinery, or plant that caused plaintiff's injury — "a narrow plank" which was "an unsafe and most dangerous appliance," or a plank on which plaintiff was compelled to stand…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Peters v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Miller v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Maring-Crawford Motor Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Woodmen of the World v. AlfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Dulaney v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API