Weill v. Hecht
The Superior Court of New York City
Action on a guaranty.
1Opinion of the CourtMo Adam, J.
The action is on an instrument in these words:
“ New. York, Jan. 29th, 1894.
i:In consideration of Elie Weill & Co., of Paris, France, extending further credit accommodations to the S. J. Held Company, of New York; I hereby guaranty to the said Elie Weill & Co. the prompt payment at maturity, by the said S. J. Held Company, of all moneys to become due to said Elie Weill & Co. for goods which they may buy and ship for the said S. J. Held & Co., to the amount of twenty-five thousand francs, or the equivalent in United States gold coin. And it is understood that the purchases and shipments above…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Beakes v. . DacunhaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.