Legal Opinion

Weill v. Hecht

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided October 15, 1895Published

Action on a guaranty.

1Opinion of the CourtMo Adam, J.

The action is on an instrument in these words:

“ New. York, Jan. 29th, 1894.

i:In consideration of Elie Weill & Co., of Paris, France, extending further credit accommodations to the S. J. Held Company, of New York; I hereby guaranty to the said Elie Weill & Co. the prompt payment at maturity, by the said S. J. Held Company, of all moneys to become due to said Elie Weill & Co. for goods which they may buy and ship for the said S. J. Held & Co., to the amount of twenty-five thousand francs, or the equivalent in United States gold coin. And it is understood that the purchases and shipments above…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Beakes v. . DacunhaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API