Bradford v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Ken Wise, Justice
A jury found appellant Elena Antoinette Bradford guilty of failing to report child abuse.1 In a single issue, appellant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient under the corpus delicti rule because there is no evidence corroborating her extrajudicial confession. The State contends that the corpus delicti rule does not apply because appellant did not “confess” to the crime. The State does not argue that there is any corroborating evidence of appellant’s guilt.
We hold that the corpus delicti rule applies, and no evidence corroborates the corpus delicti.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rocha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.