Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Thompson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2003No. CR-01-0435-PRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRyan, Justice

¶ 36 The court of appeals in State v. Ramirez, 190 Ariz. 65, 69, 945 P.2d 376, 380 (App.1997), held that the 1978 statutory definition of premeditation, along with the instruction that premeditation may be as instantaneous as successive thoughts of the mind, “obliterates any meaningful difference between first and second degree murder— other than the penalties.” The Ramirez court concluded that juries should be instructed that “premeditation requires actual reflection.” Id. at 70, 945 P.2d at 381. In obvious disagreement with the Ramirez decision, the legislature responded in 1998 by amending…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API