Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Wear
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 1939No. 28204PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county, on the 27th day of September, 1930, by Dewey Wear, as plaintiff, against J. E. Mabee and the Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, as defendants.
A demurrer of the defendant J. E. Mabee to the plaintiff’s petition was sustained and the action dismissed as to him.
On April 6, 1937, a jury was impaneled to try the cause, but after the introduction of evidence it was discharged and the cause was submitted to the court for decision, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals, appearing herein as plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. WhittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Cherokee Oil & Gas Co. v. Lucky Leaf Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Spring v. MajorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Van Zant v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Board of Com'rs of Adair County v. RaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Kohler, Stover & Ivey v. City of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.