Legal Opinion

State v. Swift & Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 29, 1917PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction.— Hon. Galvin N. Miller, Judge. Transferred to st. louis court of appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, P. J.

— The defendants were charged under section 651, Eevised Statutes 1909, with having offered for sale or kept on hand a colored substance composed of animal fat or vegetable oil in imitation of butter. This offense -is denounced as a misdemeanor. [Sec. 658, E. S. 1909.] Upon a trial defendants were found guilty and their punishment assessed at a fine of $50. They thereupon perfected an appeal to this court. The appellate jurisdiction of this court is invoked on the ground that a constitutional question is involved, although the record prior to the filing of the motion in arrest of judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Dickey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Schmidt v. Supreme CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DanforthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Village of Grandview v. McElroySupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  4. City of Marshfield Ex Rel. Hasten v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  5. Wollums Ex Rel. Wollums v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API