Legal Opinion

Bozeman v. J. B. Colt Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1923No. 3 Div. 423PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

The action is one of as-sumpsit for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Under the general issue any proof therefore, showing that there was no sale of the goods by the plaintiff to the defendant is admissible. Shepherd v. Butcher Tool & Hdw. Co., 198 Ala. 275, 73 South. 498; La. Lumber Co. v. Farrior, 9 Ala. App. 383, 63 South. 788; Shannon & Co. v. McElroy, 3 Ala. App. 519, 57 South. 118.

If the defendant gave the plaintiff an order for goods to be shipped not less than six months after the order was- given, and with a reservation of the right to cancel said order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Capital Security Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Shepherd v. Butcher Tool & Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Green & Sons v. Lineville Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Fulton v. Sword Medicine Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Tillis & O'Neal v. AustinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. SealeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Northwestern Rug Mfg. Co. v. Russellville Furniture & Mercantile Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Cryar v. OgleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Mayfield v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API