Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1979No. 39016PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Charles Lee Thomas was charged by information with capital murder. The penalty provision of the information was dismissed due to the fact that discretionary alternative penalties similar to those articulated in § 559.005 and § 559.009 RSMo 1975 had been declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. (See, Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed. 346 (1972)). The charge was revised to read murder in the first degree and the corresponding penalty provision was to be governed by § 559.011 RSMo 1975.1

Thomas was convicted by a jury of murder in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BarlowSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. State v. DurenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. State v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charles Lee Thomas v. Donald W. WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Charles Lee Thomas v. Donald W. Wyrick and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. LenzaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. SpulakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API