Legal Opinion

Brenke v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1951No. 1003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 A.2d 677 (1951)

BRENKE

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 1003.

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Argued January 29, 1951.

Decided February 16, 1951.

Eugene F. Lane, Washington, D. C., with whom Michael J. Lane, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

William L. Shea, Washington, D. C., with whom George Morris Fay and Joseph M. Howard, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and CLAGETT, Associate Judges.

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of soliciting for a lewd and immoral purpose.[1] and was sentenced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  5. Kinard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Rose v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Hector v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API