Legal Opinion

Union National Bank v. Ternes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1922No. 23,497PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas E. Elcock, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill to subject a tract of land to the payment of a judgment which plaintiff had obtained against the defendant, and the judgment being against the defendants, they appeal.

It is contended that the petition failed to state a cause of action and that the proof offered under it did not .warrant the judgment that was rendered. In the petition it was alleged that on October 14, 1919, plaintiff recovered a judgment against J. P. Ternes for $2,872.12 and that the judgment is wholly unpaid. That…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tennent v. BatteySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Parmenter v. LomaxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. State Bank v. ChattenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. LemleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Harrison v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cole v. ThackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  2. Farmers State Bank ex rel. Johnson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Kinnard v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Benson v. AltenburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Achorn v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API