Legal Opinion

Namm v. Charles E. Frosst & Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BISCHOFF, P. J. A. D.

This is a pharmaceutical products liability case wherein plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their complaint against approximately 44 drug manufacturing and distributing companies. The compliant charges defendants with liability based upon principles of negligence, breach of warranties and strict liability.

*25Plaintiffs Gail Namm and Paul Namm, are husband and wife and in their complaint they allege that prior to February 15, 1949 all of the defendants named “manufactured, compounded, tested, sold and marketed” large…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Anderson v. SombergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Ferrigno v. Eli Lilly and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Namm v. Charles E. Frosst & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API