Smith v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
This is a review of the decision of .the Industrial Commission which denied a claim for permanent disability benefits. As we have decided the case on jurisdictional grounds, only a brief summary of the facts is necessary.
On February 9, 1975, petitioner and a fellow worker were engaged in cutting pipe as employees of Hecla Mining Company, the defendant employer. While carrying a section of pipe, petitioner slipped and fell, twisting his back. Medical expenses and compensation for temporary disability were paid to or on behalf of petitioner through April 16, 1975. Following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Chavez v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Janis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Harambasic v. Barrett & Hilp & MacCo Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Judd v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lee v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Lee v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Mendoza v. arledge/copperpointCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021