Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Dahl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1931No. 28,322Published

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Action to enjoin defendant from trespassing on a portion of plaintiff’s land (1.1 acres) which was claimed by defendant to be a highway, and to recover damages for trespasses thereon since 1924. The township of Burnsville, in which plaintiff’s land (54 acres acquired by him on December 16, 1916) is situate, intervened and in its complaint alleged that the strip of land involved had been established and maintained as a public road by common law dedication and statutory user. It also asked that plaintiff be permanently enjoined…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marchand v. Town of Maple GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Carpenter v. GantzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Arndt v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Jungels v. SchramelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Haramon v. KrauseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API