Legal Opinion

Whitcomb v. Girard Coal Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The bills in these cases were filed by George I). Whit-comb, a resident and citizen of the state of California, and the St. Louis Coal & Machine Alining Company, a corporation formed-and existing under the laws of the state of 1 llinois, and having its principal office in East St. Louis, St. Glair county, in said state, against the above-mentioned coal companies, corporations organized and existing under the laws of the state of Illinois. The cases are alike in their legal features, differing only in the names of the parties defendant, and will therefore be treated as one case. It is alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. Lowell Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1866
  2. Sanders v. LoganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rice & Adams Corp. v. LathropSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. In re Chicago Sugar-Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API