Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Itoman (U.S.A.), Inc. & Daewoo Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 11, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
In December 1983 Itoman (U.S.A.), Inc. (Itoman), a textile importer, agreed through R.D. New & Co. (New) (an international textile broker) to purchase fabric from Daewoo Corporation (Daewoo), a textile exporter in Korea. On December 10, 1983, Daewoo sent New a signed "Confirmation of Order/Sales Note” (Confirmation), on a form providing for arbitration in Korea in accordance with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of HuxleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Ernest J. Michel & Co., Inc. v. Anabasis Trade, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- American Utex International, Ltd. v. ICC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- American Utex International, Ltd. v. ICC Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Matter of Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc. v. B & R Textile Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irving R. Boody & Co. v. Win Holdings International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Graniteville Co. v. Star Knits of California, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- In re the Arbitration between D.J. Sportswear, Inc. & Stelmar Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991