Legal Opinion

Glazer v. Abroms

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1967No. 2706PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL, Judge.

This is a suit for $25,000, the amount allegedly due under an oral contract to share a commission; alternatively, the same amount,is sought under the doctrine of quantum meruit. Defendants answered in the form of a general denial. After trial there was judgment, based on quantum meruit, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Defendants have appealed therefrom. Plaintiff has answered the appeal seeking an increase in the award to the total amount of $25,000.

The basic facts are not in dispute. The individual defendant, William Abroms, a registered broker dealing in the sale…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lowy v. BulliardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Insulation Technologies, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Bailey v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. A. K. Roy, Inc. v. RoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API