Glazer v. Abroms
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL, Judge.
This is a suit for $25,000, the amount allegedly due under an oral contract to share a commission; alternatively, the same amount,is sought under the doctrine of quantum meruit. Defendants answered in the form of a general denial. After trial there was judgment, based on quantum meruit, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Defendants have appealed therefrom. Plaintiff has answered the appeal seeking an increase in the award to the total amount of $25,000.
The basic facts are not in dispute. The individual defendant, William Abroms, a registered broker dealing in the sale…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lowy v. BulliardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Insulation Technologies, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bailey v. R. E. Heidt Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- A. K. Roy, Inc. v. RoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980