Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. M.D.T.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2013No. A11-1285Published

1Dissent

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice

(dissenting).

Jean Valjean: But this is common humanity! Are you a machine?

Inspector Javert: I am an officer of the law doing my duty. I have no choice in the matter. It makes no difference what I think or feel or want. It has nothing to do with me — nothing! Can’t you see that?

Les Miserables 1

[[Image here]]

This case turns on the answer to a single question: Are the benefits of expunging M.D.T.’s criminal records commensurate with the disadvantages to the public and the burden on the court in administering and enforcing the expungement order? This may appear at first…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API